<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeep EV performance specs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lastgascar.com/jeep-ev-performance-specs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lastgascar.com/jeep-ev-performance-specs/</link>
	<description>Hybrids, plug in electrics, hydrogen cars - the top source for news and discussion.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.lastgascar.com/jeep-ev-performance-specs/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastgascar.com/?p=249#comment-63</guid>
		<description>That's nice. I've been waiting to get a Jeep until they come out with a hybrid or electric version. I wonder what kind of climbing ability it has?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nice. I&#8217;ve been waiting to get a Jeep until they come out with a hybrid or electric version. I wonder what kind of climbing ability it has?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkinCa</title>
		<link>http://www.lastgascar.com/jeep-ev-performance-specs/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkinCa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lastgascar.com/?p=249#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Its hard to believe they are able to get essentially the same range as the Volt is claiming. They must just be packing a larger battery in there, but wouldn't it have to be more efficient also?  hmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its hard to believe they are able to get essentially the same range as the Volt is claiming. They must just be packing a larger battery in there, but wouldn&#8217;t it have to be more efficient also?  hmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
